user_mobilelogo
  • Hahn, L., M. ten Buuren, M. de Nijs, T.S. Snijders & P. Fikkert (2019). ‘Acquiring novel words in a second language through mutual play with child songs – the Noplica Energy Center’. To appear in Proceedings of Musica.
  • Ramachers, S.T.M.R., Brouwer, S.M. & Fikkert, J.P.M. (2018). Perception and lexical encoding of tone in a restricted tone language. Developmental evidence from Limburgian. In Proceedings of TAL 2018, Sixth International Symposium on Tonal Aspects of Languages (pp. 108-113). Berlijn
  • Fikkert, P & I. Lammertink (2016). Speech perception in children with a cleft palate: preliminary finding. Proceedings of the 40th annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, Jennifer Scott and Deb Waughtal (eds.), 130-142 (complete pdf)
  • Van der Feest, S.V.H., P. Fikkert, & B. L. Davis (2016). Cross-linguistic differences in the perception of coronal and dorsal CV-combinations: Evidence from English and Dutch. Proceedings of the 40th annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, Jennifer Scott and Deb Waughtal (eds.), 417–428 (complete pdf)
  • Klatter-Folmer, H.A.K., Hout, R.W.N.M. van, Heuvel, H. van den, Fikkert, J.P.M., Baker, A., Jong, J. de, Wijnen, F., Sanders, E.P. & Trilsbeek, P.J.T.M. (2014). Vulnerability in Acquisition, Language Impairments in Dutch: Creating a VALID Data Archive. In Proceedings of LREC 2014 (pp. 357-364). Reykjavik: European Language Resources Association (ELRA).
  • Heuvel, H. van den, Sanders, E.P., Klatter-Folmer, H.A.K., Hout, R.W.N.M. van, Fikkert, J.P.M., Wijnen, F. & Trilsbeek, P.J.T.M. (2014). Data curation for a VALID Archive of Dutch Language Impairment Data. Dutch Journal of Applied Linguistics, 3 (2), 127–135. doi: 10.1075/dujal.3.2.02heu
  • Fikkert, P & A. Chen (2011). ‘The Role of Word-Stress and Intonation in Word Recognition in Dutch 14- and 24-Month-Olds’. In: Nick Danis, Kate Mesh, and Hyunsuk Sung (Eds.), Proceedings of the Boston University Conference on Child Development 35. 222–232.
  • Dijkstra, N. & P. Fikkert (2011). ‘Universal Constraints on the Discrimination of Place of Articulation? Asymmetries in the Discrimination of ‘paan’ and ‘taan’ by 6-month-old Dutch Infants’. In: Nick Danis, Kate Mesh, and Hyunsuk Sung (Eds.), Proceedings of the Boston University Conference on Child Development 35. 170–182.
  • Bergmann, C., M. Paulus & P. Fikkert (2010). ‘A closer look at pronoun comprehension: comparing different methods’. In: João Costa, Ana Castro, Maria Lobo and Fernanda Pratas (Eds.), Language Acquisition and Development: Proceedings of GALA 2009.
  • Bree, E. de, P. van Alphen, P. Fikkert & F. Wijnen (2008). ‘Metrical stress in comprehension and production of Dutch children at risk of dyslexia’. In: H. Chan, H. Jacob, and E. Kapia (Eds.), BUCLD 32: Proceedings of the 32nd annual Boston University Conference on Language Development. 60-71.
  • Santos, R. S. & P. Fikkert (2007). ‘The relationship between word prosodic structure and sentence prosody. (Non)evidence from Brazilian Portuguese’. In: S. Baauw, J. van Kampen & M. Pinto (Eds.), The Acquisition of Romance Languages. Selected Papers from The Romance Turn II. LOT (LOT Occasional Series 8): Utrecht. 165-179.
  • Chen. A. & P. Fikkert (2007). ‘Intonation of early two-word utterances in Dutch’. Proceedings of the 16th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences. 315–320.
  • Alphen, P. van, E. de Bree, P. Fikkert & F. Wijnen. (2007). ‘The role of metrical stress in comprehension and production in Dutch children at-risk of dyslexia’. Proceedings of Interspeech 2007. 2313–2316.
  • Zamuner, T.S., A. Kerkhoff & P. Fikkert (2006). ‘Acquisition of voicing neutralization and alternations in Dutch’. Proceedings of the 30th annual Boston University Conference on Language Development. Vol. 2. Cascadilla Press. 701–712.
  • Fikkert, P., M. Van Heugten, P. Offermans & T.S. Zamuner (2005). ‘Rhymes as a window into grammar’. In: A. Brugos, M.R. Clark-Cotton & S. Ha (Eds.), Proceedings of the 29 the annual Boston University Conference on Language Development. Vol. 1. Sommerville, MA, Cascadilla Press. 204–215.
  • Feest, S. van der & P. Fikkert (2005). ‘Segmental detail in children's early lexical representations’. In: Proceedings of the ISCA Workshop on Plasticity in Speech Perception (PSP) on CD.
  • Levelt, C.C., Schiller, N.O. & P. Fikkert (2003). ‘Metrical priming in speech production’. In: Proceedings 15th ICPhS Barcelona. 2481–1484.
  • Fikkert, P. & Z. Penner (1999). ‘Stagnation in Prosodic Development of Language-Disordered Children’. In: M. Beers (ed.), Antwerp Papers in Linguistics 96: 1–16.
  • Fikkert, P. & Z. Penner (1998). ‘Stagnation in prosodic development of language-disordered children’. Proceedings of the Boston University Conference on Language Acquisition 1997. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press. 201–212.
  • Fikkert, P. & M. J. Freitas (1997). ‘Acquisition of syllable structure constraints: Evidence from Dutch and Portuguese’. In: Language acquisition: Knowledge representation and processing. Proceedings of GALA '97. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. 217–222.
  • Fikkert, P. (1996). ‘A parametric acquisition model for stress’. WECOL 1994 Proceedings.
  • Fikkert, P. (1995). ‘A prosodic account of truncation in child language’. In: W. U. Dressler, M. Prinzhorn & J. Rennison (Eds.), Phonologica, Proceedings of the 7th International Phonology Meeting 1992. Torino: Rosenberg & Sellier. 77–86.
  • Fikkert, P. (1995). ‘Models of acquisition: How to acquire stress’. In J. Beckman (Ed.), Proceedings of NELS 25, Vol. 2. Amherst: GLSA. 27–42.
  • Fikkert, P. (1995). ‘The role of negative evidence in the acquisition of phonology’. In: M. Verrips & F. Wijnen (Eds.), Parameters, Amsterdam Series in Child Language Development 4. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press. 33–52. This also appeared in: I. Moen, H. G. Simonsen & H. Lødrup (Eds.), Proceedings from the XVth Scandinavian conference of linguistics. Oslo: Oslo University Press. 148–159.
  • Fikkert, P. (1993). ‘The Acquisition of Dutch stress’. In: M. Verrips & F. Wijnen (Eds.), The acquisition of Dutch, Amsterdam Series in Child Language Development 1. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press. 21–35.
  • Fikkert, P. (1992). ‘Metathesis in kinderfonologie: een oplossing voor de kip/ei kwestie’. (Metathesis in child phonology: a solution for the chicken/egg problem). In: P. Jordens & A. Wijnands (Eds.), Fourth NET-symposium 1992 , VU, Amsterdam. 25–30.

Department of Dutch Language and Culture,
Centre for Language Studies,
Radboud University of Nijmegen,
P.O. Box 9103,
6500 HD Nijmegen,
The Netherlands

Tel: (+31) 24–3612669
E-mail: p.fikkert@let.ru.nl

Radboud